Larry’s field notes definitely needs to be preserved. You know- for science! -Jack
Let me clue you guys in.
A common tactic used by dishonest bully assholes is to pretend that the internet is a real place, which functions on the same rules of civility as in real life conversations.
When they see someone saying something they don’t like, they weaponize the unstated rules of discourse by swooping in and “only asking questions”.
Because in normal face to face human interaction when someone asks you a question, you usually answer it. That’s the default path.
So you answer. The dishonest trash ignores that and asks another. Repeat. Again. Repeat. Again. And they aren’t just simple questions. They are homework assignments.
Deep down on an instinctual level dishonest pricks understand the Brandollini Principle. So they throw out some little bullshit, knowing it will take you an order of magnitude more effort to refute that bullshit than to create it.
Even worse, this type of asshole travels in packs. So no matter how many times you do one homework assignment for a stranger, there’s a dozen others in the comments doing the same thing. All of them willfully ignoring the answers you already provided to the others.
Now, because these are profoundly dishonest people and there is no actual honest engagement at play, they will bury you in bullshit until the polite victim finally says enough and gets snappy OR they will ask a question which is too complex to explain, doesn’t have a real answer, or is just so pointless no one will bother.
At that point the dishonest fake civility people will pounce. Because by failing or refusing to answer them, they declare that you have broken the rules of civility. They win. You lose. You suck.
Of course these rules of civility are a one way street. At no point do they honestly answer the people asking them questions. They might spend 30 seconds on Google and paste the first headline they think agrees with them (and they never read the article) but you have to write them a thesis with annotated bibliography or else. Which they will ignore anyway, and then demand you write another.
In real life if some fucking bum comes up to you asking bullshit questions because he wants to take advantage of you “nice” people get trapped, and now you’re in a conversation you never wanted about how he needs to borrow $20 for gas money because his baby mamma got a job interview and blah blah blah until he robs you.
These fuckers are that, only online.
So just like the in real life bullshit panhandler addict loser, you can either play their game or be assertive and tell them to fuck off. Both versions get super upset when you refuse to play by the fake rules of civility.
How can you tell a lying, time sucking bum, from an honest person who is seeking good faith discussion. Oh there’s many tells. The liars stink.
So they know they’re full of shit. We know they’re full of shit. They know that we know. We know that they know that we know. So why should we waste time pretending?
When you get one of these time sucking assholes, just skip to where you know you’re gonna end up anyway. If you feel like answering questions ONLY do it for the audience. Anything else is a waste.
EDIT: for Internet Zoology purposes this type of creature will be called a Time Sucking Cockwomble.
Sometime during Sad Puppies I made a new rule for myself: no links. And it was thanks to exactly the behavior described here.
I have to provide links, or it didn’t happen. And then my links aren’t good enough, because they’ve been “debunked” by persons unknown, so I need new links. But they don’t have to provide links, because their position is “obvious”.
Yeah. No links for you, Time Sucking Cockwombles. Go look it up yourself, and also K my A while you’re at it.
This week of course is worse than usual. Watching the gun control mafia operate this week, after so many people died, these worms need a big cup of shut up. I never argue anymore, I just tell them they’re lying commies. That’s the bottom line after all, there’s no point in holding back.
I remember having a discussion with someone who happened to be sitting at their computer. I referenced a reputable source, they typed quickly on their keyboard and said “He’s been debunked quite thoroughly”. End of conversation as far as I was concerned, I never brought that topic up again with him.
This describes the forums at Arfcom perfectly.
Unrelated to this. Larry, any thought on this kerfuffle about Shadow Light Press and their contracts and NDAs?
They also ignore any and all logic and pretend they know far more than you. I have seen people waste God knows how much time with logical statements or even sources to why socialism is a terrible idea and has failed at anything but theft and murder every time it has been tried and it had been tried countless times in the 20th century alone.
The delusion and disingenuous of these sentient, but certainly not sapient shitweasels is without compare. Most seem to have self awareness and common sense on the level of a movie or folklore zombie.
Which is why I found it so funny that there was a Bob Hope movie long before I was born where this guy explains a voodoo zombie to Bob Hope to which he quickly chimes out.
“You see them sometimes, walking around blankly with no will of their own, not knowing what they do, not caring.”
“Oh you mean like Democrats?”
Any upcoming appearances? (If there’s a page with this info, I’ve missed it. Sorry.) My mom is a huge fan in the SLC area. Want to add the date/time to her B&N gift card if possible. LOL.
Haven’t visited here in a while and just got through reading most of the posts since I’ve been gone. Most were very funny and I’m especially glad you’ve stopped sucking George RR Martins flaccid weiner. Good for you Larry!