Tag Archives: Fisking

Plowshare Returns!

Oliver “Plowshare” Forge, my favorite lefty FDR-fanclub blogger, has yet again posted about me!

I eagerly await these. If you will recall, Plow hates me because I’m Mormon. He hates me because of my political opinions. He hates me because I’m friends with MadOgre. He hates me because I’ve had more success in life than he has. He hates me for a bunch of things that only exist in his head. He once hated me for being pro-military though I hadn’t been in the military right after he said that he meant no offense to people who tried to join but were medically unsuitable (whoops), He hates me because apparently the most powerful voices in the Neo-Conservative world are Dick Cheney, Glenn Beck, Ted Nugent, and Me. (which I’m still trying to figure out, because Plow’s definition of Neo-Con apparently changes everytime he forgets to take his meds).

However, he does always link to me in his tirades, so WordPress usually gives me a heads up. I’m very thankful for this software feature, because utterly dismantling Plow’s posts has provided me minutes of enjoyment. Plus my regular readers seem to like it when I club him like a baby seal.

Now normally Plow just posts some massive, spittle flecked, vein popping out of his forehead tirade about something that is hard to follow for a couple hundred words, then with some historical thing from the 1940s that he cut and pasted from Wikipedia about the Bonus Army or something, but usually there is some nugget of a point in there.

Not this time. Which makes me a little sad, because it is hard to Fisk somebody when they don’t actually have anything to say.

http://plowshareforge.blogspot.com/2009/05/incorrigible.html

Apparently today’s adventure began with Plow checking MadOgre. His doctors have warned him not to check MadOgre, because it elevates Plow’s blood pressure, and that causes the voices in his head to become louder, but Plow just can’t help himself. So he quotes something from George that makes perfect sense, but then Plow can’t seem to come out of his drug addled haze (thanks medical MJ!) long enough to say why he disagrees with George, so Plow lists off the fact that George went to some good schools and obtained a decent education… Okay… You showed him, Plow.

Then out of the blue, Plow had this to say about me.
Hi Larry (He’s gay, you know) Larry is.
By that I mean, of course, “festive”.

You know that you’ve absolutely demolished somebody when you’ve picked their posts apart line by line, and exposed them as an utter and complete fool on demand for years, and all they can come back with is “Well… You’re GAY!”

I’m surprised he didn’t call my Mom fat while he was at it, or that I throw like a girl.

Plow, I’m astounded by your keen debating skills.  Sadly, I’m not homosexual. (remember, you already hate me for being a right-wing fundamentalist Christian/Mormon, I hate to remind you of this, but to be fair to you, chronic paint-huffing will damage your long-term memory).  I like girls. If you don’t, that’s totally cool. Whatever floats your boat.

And even if I was gay, I probably wouldn’t be the flamboyant festive type. I even have a hard time wearing colorful shirts.
And, To you neo-con twinks;
Thanks and thanks again.
You are the cheapest entertainment in town.

No… Thank you, Plow. You stand as an icon of all that makes the left so very proud.  You are fervent in your beliefs that the .gov needs to rob and destroy the productive to give to the stupid, yet you are unable to provide a logical argument as to why the bailouts are good or will work.

Tonight, while you are smoking your hooka, I want you to try and string together a few coherant thoughts about where my political philosophy is wrong (other than: U R teh Gay! ), arrange these thoughts into semi-complete sentences, and then mash them haphazardly onto your keyboard.  I eagerly await your response.  See, us right wingers have no problem explaining why we disagree with something.

Oh, and in the spirit of Plowshare, I too will close with a historial 1930’s themed quote concerning my issues with Plow’s New Deal lovefest:

During the worst of the depression many of the farmers had to deny their families butter, eggs, meat, etc. and sell it to pay their taxes and then had to stand by and see the dead-beats carry it home to their familes by the arm load, and they knew their tax money was helping pay it… The crookedness, shelfishness [sic], greed and graft of the crooked politicians is making one gigantic racket out of the new deal and it is making this a nation of dead-beats and beggars and if it continues the people who will work will soon be nothing but slaves for the pampered poverty rats.

-Anonymous woman in Columbus, Indiana, letter of December 14, 1937 to Eleanor Roosevelt. The Great Depression, An Eyewitness History by David F. Burg.

Fisking the University of Utah editorial page about guns… again.

I found this posted on www.wethearmed.com yesterday, and because it is from a local University paper, I couldn’t resist a good fisking.  Italics are from the original article. I’m not sure if this was a staff editorial, or just somebody who wrote in. If the former, that was pathetic, save your parent’s money and drop out of school. If it was the later, I’m guessing it was written in crayon on the back of a placemat from Denny’s.

 

Guns shouldn’t be recreational

Emily Rodriguez-Vargas

We all have our own views on gun control and the Second Amendment’s “right to bear arms.”

 

I like how “right to bear arms” is in quotes. That’s to clarify that pesky Second Amendment from its alternate titles, like… um… well, you know… those other titles. I usually use quotes in an editorial to point out absurdities. Like calling Emily Rodriguez-Vargas “truthful”.


Many people exercise this right and believe that because of it, they are able to do whatever they want, even if it means storing deadly weapons in a house of curious, naïve children.

 

My kids are rather intelligent, and I’ve taught them to use guns safely. If your kids are naïve, you might want to take a real hard look at who’s teaching them about life. And Mrs. Rodriguez-Vargas, you might want to also study the extremely long list of other household products that you possess that are far more deadly to your kids, like 5-gallon buckets and bathtubs.

 

Although we have the right to own a gun, it can invite tragic consequences.

 

Yes, and it usually involves stupidity, like just about every other thing in life with tragic consequences. Not having a gun never causes any problems, because a little thing like getting raped repeatedly and then bludgeoned until the responding paramedics openly weep when they see the victim’s crushed face. Heaven forbid that something tragic happens, like the victim shoots the rapist or something…

Shooting is the most popular seasonal sport in the United States

. Utah’s recreational shooting numbers lie at 14.9 percent, with Idaho’s average at 18.9 percent, according to a June 2007 press release by the National Shooting Sports Foundation. These results are more than twice the national average. In addition, a 2006 NSSF survey found approximately 50 million Americans said they had been shooting with a rifle within the past two years.

 

Totally unacceptable… Idaho is beating us by 4%.


If shooting is what keeps us entertained, then guns are needed less for self-protection and to provide food than just for fun.

 

That’s kind of idiotic if you think about it. Just because something has one use, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t have any other uses. Sex just isn’t for making babies either.

 

Besides, if my gun is to be useful for self-defense, that means I need to actually practice with it. You can take a karate class, but unless you train, you’re less than useless. Just don’t have fun doing it, because you might offend Emily Rodriguez-Vargas. 

 

This type of hobby is an excuse to feed our aggressive side and to train our mind to accept this use of weapons not out of necessity, but for the thrill it provides.

 

And I drive my car to work around 75 miles an hour. For some odd reason, even if I watched Nascar, I don’t do 200 miles an hour on I-15. (well, at least very often).

 

Let me digress for a moment. A lot of people in our society today have a very negative attitude about aggression. Aggression can be a very positive trait in some circumstances.  Don’t believe me? When somebody decides to victimize you, and the cops aren’t anywhere around, try giving them a hug and understanding their childhood. When he gets done strangling you with your own pantyhose, let me know how that turned out for you.

 

If you are being assaulted you had better reach deep down inside and find your aggressive inner-caveman, or you’re going to scream and run and get eaten. I see this all the time when I’m teaching self-defense. Some people have no aggressive bone in their body, and their verbal challenge to an attacker is some variation of “please Mr. Rapist, don’t make me hurt you,” in a very meek tone of voice. Oh, that’s gonna work awesome.

 

Aggression is a positive trait in soldiers, athletes, marketing people, business leaders, and your lawyer. (not the other guy’s though, then it’s bad)  Like all personality traits, it has its place and is just another handy tool when used in moderation.

 

Violent video games are prevalent.

 

Wow, that was out of left field. It is like she’s got this big article about nuclear physics, and then puts in a single line like “I like squirrels.”

 

Now I have multiple reasons to laugh at Emily Rodriguez-Vargas. I’ve got a house full of guns, friends with houses full of guns, and the training to go on a rampage that would make the Mumbai shooters look like the Girl Scouts selling Thin Mints. I also play violent video games, like just about every other U.S.

male in my generation.  (and for the record, Call Of Duty 5 is a LOUSY trainer for actual fighting, though I’ll rock your world with an FG42 and my pack of vicious Nazi Assault-Hounds)

 

Even children are given fake guns as toys.

 

I’m taking it that Ms. Rodriguez-Vargas doesn’t have any boys. You can give a 2 year old boy a Barbie doll, and he’ll bend it in half to make a gun. Before guns were invented, little boys took sticks and made guns. Medieval parents were all like “What’s little Skwisgar doing with that stick?” “I don’t know, Helmut, now quit yapping and help throw these plague bodies on the cart.”

 

Little boys that don’t make fake guns, clubs, or swords get beat up and have their lunch money taken. That is Darwinian evolution. Later on in life these kids get jobs as “journalists” or “Democrat Congressmen”.


Guns, loaded and empty, are kept in homes everywhere. According to a Sept. 23 report by the National Rifle Association, more than 250 million privately-owned firearms exist in the
United States, with the number increasing by 4.5 million each year.

 

Man! Got that one beat this year! I can’t wait to see the Obamathon 2008 National Gun Sales results. I personally sold 4.5 million AR-15s on Thursday… Approximately.

 

That is almost one gun for every person in the United States.

 

I can cover for my cul-de-sac if any of my neighbors are slacking.

 

This doesn’t bode well for other statistics. The Canadian Coalition for Gun Control, for example, reports that in 2007, Canada had 188 firearm homicides while the United States

had 10,086.

 

If we want to compare Apples to Apples, let’s take the states that are most like Canada with roughly the same population and compare. Take the justified homicides, suicides, shootings of criminals by police, and illegal aliens out of the equation, and I’d still take Idaho over Alberta.

 

Plus, like all socialist paradises, Canada loves to cook the books. Let us pull out our cesspools of Democrat controlled major cities, and the comparison is a whole lot closer. Only my health care isn’t crap. Suck on that, Quebec.


The unbelievable number of weapons available isn’t exactly reassuring. No matter what the reason for owning a gun, it’s more of a danger than an actual protection. The National Center for Victims of Crime provides a study that found the likelihood is 40 times greater that a gun will be used against a member of one’s own family than to prevent a crime if it is kept in the home, whether it is committed out of rage or by mistake. The study also found that once every six hours, an individual between the ages of 10 and 19 will commit suicide by way of a gun.

 

That 40 times number has been dismissed as statistically false on a bunch of web gun forums or by anybody with the ability to do basic math. It has become something of a running joke in the gun community. No matter how many times I repeat something that is wrong, it doesn’t make it a fact… Pay attention, Al Gore!

 

Now to prevent mistakes, people who buy guns should come take classes from people like me. But that might be fun, and Ms. Rodriguez-Vargas already pointed out how bad that might be!

 

And for suicide, this may sound heartless, but somebody else’s inability to deal with life shouldn’t cause a penalty on anybody else’s freedom. I’m sure the disarmed residents of Chicago take pride in the fact that the guns they aren’t allowed to own aren’t being used for suicides when they’re being robbed and having their faces kicked in by the local hooliganry and the police are too busy collecting bribe money for their governor’s office or sodomizing prisoners with broom handles to respond. (wait, was that CPD or NYPD? I get my giant dystopian liberal city-states mixed up)

 

And it isn’t like somebody can’t off themselves with a knife, drugs, alcohol, tall buildings, rope, traffic, water, fire, or my personal favorite, taping 200 Twinkies to your body and walking onto the set of the Biggest Loser. Guns are just more efficient. Which is why they’re also the #1 choice for shooting bad people. Twinkies on the other hand… not so much, but they’re so very delicious.


On the one hand, very few people are actually planning a shooting.

 

Except for the bad people that are planning shootings right this minute. And when it inevitably goes down, people like you become awfully glad when people like me are around. Otherwise you just like to bitch and whine about us.

 

We haven’t had any problems with this at the U, and one hopes we won’t in the future.

 

You can hope. I’ll be “aggressive”. I’ve taught $20,000 worth of free Utah Concealed Carry classes to college students and faculty for when a problem does occur. So I’ve evened the odds for you a bit. I’ll be eagerly awaiting your thank-you card.

 

The offer still stands. I’ll teach the Utah CCW class for FREE to any student, faculty, or staff of any Utah college or university.

 

Life is a one-chance game without start-over buttons or multiple lives. People who aren’t responsible enough to have someone else’s life in their hands should be as far away from lethal weapons as possible.

 

Well, we agree with something. Except I think we should extend that idea to things like voting.


When shooting clay pigeons, deer in the hunting season or anything else, not only does a potential deadly threat exist if something goes wrong, but embracing shooting as enjoyment can be harmful and destructive behavior as well.

 

You had a giant essay to explain the destructive part, but I must have missed it.  But then again, I’m not a trained “journalist”. I’d rather get a case of Twinkies and a roll of duct tape and end it all than be a journalist.


Although a stricter control of guns in
Utah would be ideal,

 

Says who?

 

what is even more important is the education of students and citizens on gun responsibility and an awareness

 

I’ve pretty much devoted thousands of hours of my life to that. Check. I’m sure you’ll show up to volunteer your time at the range to help me.  The stuff I teach saves lives. The stuff you “teach” is just rebranded hoplophobic claptrap.

 

that even recreational use of weapons train their minds to love this type of violence.

 

That was obviously spoken by somebody who’s never seen real violence. Shooting a clay pigeon out of the air or knocking a pop can off a fence with a .22 isn’t violence.

 

Real violence is hiding under your desk at Virginia Tech while a lunatic slaughters everyone around you, but you can’t do a thing about it because people like YOU, Ms. Rodriguez-Vargas, were made “uncomfortable” by the very notion that people be allowed to have firearms.


Real violence is what evil men are prepared to inflict on you and your family at the drop of the hat because of convenience, or bad luck, or just because the voices in his head told him to swallow your soul. He doesn’t give a shit how you feel about violence, because he’s really damn good at it.

 

If we accept shooting objects for pleasure, and don’t realize it has consequences, we might have an even larger problem in the near future.

 

Yeah, and since we’ve been shooting stuff for pleasure for about 500 years, I’ll be waiting for the larger problem… Hey, wait a second. I lived in one of the most crime-ridden inner-cities in America. Ironically enough, none of the gang banger scumbags ever went to the range for a round of sporting clays. Gee whiz, maybe we should check and see what percentage of those 10,000 some odd shootings were committed by people like me, or members of the gun culture that engage in recreational shooting…

 

Which brings us to the ugly little secret of the Canada vs. US comparison above that no liberal likes to talk about. Pull the homicides out of the mix from the inner-city and poor minority on minority violence, and we’re far SAFER than Canada. So explain to me, Ms. Rodriguez-Vargas, why you’re so fixated on taking guns from people in flyover country, but you won’t address the violence in Democrat controlled/high gun-control areas?

 

Does that not fit your agenda?

 

Instead of using mechanized forms of destruction for recreational purposes, more peaceful hobbies can be found.

 

Like yoga. Or pilates. Or yogalates. (tip of the hat to Jack Brooks)


As President Dwight D. Eisenhower said, “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”

 

I call shenanigans. Quote out of context. Flag on the play. Five yard penalty.  If you’re trying to make a point on the badness of violence, you might not want to use the Supreme Allied Commander of the European Theater. Eisenhower was talking about the military-industrial complex, having just come out of the largest war in history, when our entire nation was devoted to building the weapons of war and then using them to kill a mess of Germans.

 

You want to start quoting presidents? How about I bust out every single one of the founding fathers, and all of them up until that sack of crap, Wilson

? I see your Eisenhower and raise you Thomas Jefferson:

 

A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walk.

— Thomas Jefferson, Foley, ed., Encyclopedia of Thomas Jefferson, p. 318.

 

That sound you hear is me laughing at your pathetic letter.


The once-high values of
America are found in the gun-loving hands of individuals seeking not to combat real problems such as war, crime and poverty, but to exercise their freedom to the fullest extent for recreation.

 

Damn, I’m surprised you didn’t tack global warming on there too. Guns also don’t cure cancer, one more reason to ban them. You try combating war and crime with good feelings and let me know how that works out for you. In the meantime, I’ll be having “recreation” with my guns, which also teach me how to use them as effective tools for self-defense and survival. Ironically, when war and crime show up, people like you always call people like me.

 

It is no surprise that although we preach peace in our own neighborhoods, we rank among the most homicide-prone nations.

 

Lady, you need to travel more. How many regular people engage in recreational shooting in Haiti, Somalia, Afghanistan, Myanmar, the Sudan, or the slums of Durban, Rio, or Mexico City? Unless you count the various warlords, slavers, and drug runners executing villagers as “recreation”, the percentage isn’t that high.


letters@chronicle.utah.edu
(note, they do accept submissions in Crayon)

 

That letter was even more painful to fisk than most of the nonsense that I run into. What is it with gun haters and their inability to make a point? They jump around, throwing lots of crap on the screen, hoping something sticks.

 

I think her point was that if you use guns for fun, you don’t have the right to use them for anything else. Shooting clay pigeons leads to violence, which leads to playing World Of Warcraft, which leads to more violence, which leads to the Demon Rum, which leads to Reefer Madness, or something. That is so patently retarded that I’m embarrassed for the newspaper that printed it.

 

 

Some random political thoughts

Watching the economy take a beating and the government’s resulting bumbling has been interesting. (and painful, but I quit looking at my 401K awhile ago). Every time the government proposes something, the market takes another dive.  My gut feeling on this is because most of us that are in business for ourselves instinctively distrust the government.  We’ve seen first hand that they manage to screw everything they touch.

 

So every time they propose another idiotic socialist move, business people panic, so then the government proposes something even stupider, like rewarding the crooked morons that got us into this mess, so we panic more, causing them to do something stupendously idiotic, like destroying the free market to give more power to the bureaucrats that instigated the problem, so we freak out more, so the government buys all the bad mortgages, because heaven forbid illegal aliens get evicted, so we sell all our stock and buy canned food, causing them to appoint Hugo Chavez as Secretary of the Treasury, so we start digging bomb shelters in the back yard, on and on and on and on.  By next weekend, the Dow will be at 32 points and my local credit union will only give out loans in the form of bottle caps and pocket lint.

 

The President comes on TV and as soon as he starts to talk about how the latest Marxist idea hasn’t quite panned out because we just haven’t been quite Marxy enough, I find myself just yelling “Shut up, George! Just shut the hell up!”  Then he says don’t panic, but if you don’t let us end capitalism, then the entire world will utterly implode and the next thing you know you’ll be hanging from bungee cords having a chainsaw duel against  a retarded guy with a bucket on his head in the Thunderdome, but don’t panic.

 

The government can’t help. All they can do is screw stuff up. Think about it. The Bail Out was stupid. It was so stupid that something like 90% of Americans thought it was a bad idea. You can’t get 90% of Americans to agree that colon cancer is a bad thing, so that’s pretty remarkable. So congress shoots down the Bail Out, until they pork it up with all sorts of flat-out bribery, so that it costs even more, and is even more absurd, then they pass it.  Thank goodness that we no longer have that oppressive excise tax on wooden arrows though!

 

I’m getting sick and tired of listening to this idiocy. Yes, it sucks. We’ve been stupid. We’ve been fiscally irresponsible. Our leadership has been nonexistent, Republican and Democrat. It is time for a correction. That’s just a matter of math.  Home ownership is not a right, home ownership is a purchase. Executives that were too stuck up to listen to their accountants suck and idiots who make $30,000 a year shouldn’t purchase $500,000 homes.

 

I purchased my home 6 years ago. When I applied for my loan I was approved for an absurd amount of money. I was like “You can’t be serious” and they were like “Hey, no problem!”  See, the difference is that I was smart enough to take responsibility for my actions and I can do math. I purchased a house worth approximately half of what I was approved for. Worst case scenario, I can dig ditches or flip burgers and probably still survive, which I might have to resort to anyway once President Reverend Obama destroys the gun industry.

 

A giant percentage of our bad mortgages were to illegal aliens. We were giving loans to people without even seeing any form of ID. We were giving loans based on “stated” income… “Yeah, I totally make $250,000 a year”. Banks were being accused of racism by Barack Obama’s “community activists” if they did crazy things like ask to see a W2.  Yet somehow, I’m supposed to feel sorry for people when John McCain says during the debate that we’re going to take over these bad mortgages so that nobody loses their house.  Sorry, John, some people deserve to lose their house. Then they can go get an apartment, save some money for a down payment, and buy a house that they can actually afford.

 

On that debate, holy crap… I listened on my commute home. Every time John McCain spoke I would find myself giving a very dejected sigh, as if to say, “Yep, this was the best we could come up with.” Every time Barack Obama spoke I found myself screaming the F word and punching the steering wheel. Once I got home, rather than watch the rest of the debate on TV and give myself an aneurism, I just played Call of Duty 4 on Xbox live and killed 14 year olds. It was far more productive.

 

And the other thing that keeps galling me, I’m getting sick and tired about how the media keeps talking about how we’re in another Great Depression. Anybody who knows jack squat about history knows that this isn’t even close to that. This might be coming up on the late 1970s, but we’ve still got a way to go to get to that. When was the last time somebody starved to death in America and it wasn’t caused by mental illness or being held captive by Crazy Hill People? (No offense intended to Crazy Hill People, shout out to my Red State Brothers)

 

No, stupid media, people actually STARVED during the Great Depression. If you knew 100 people, about seventy five of them might have a job, and most of those weren’t very good. Shut the hell up and read a book.

 

On a personal note, I’m sure that Plowshare Forge is reading this post, because he’s somehow fixated on me. (see prior post about how Somebody On The Internets Doesn’t Like Me). He wrote some big rambling post the other day about how I’m now his despised “NeoCon” of choice. I followed the link back to some incoherent tirade on his blog in the morning, but by the afternoon, he had taken it down. I guess after getting his ass handed to him by Mad Ogre for the last few years, he’s decided to move down a weight class to make fun of me instead.

 

I wish he would have left it up, because it was just disjointed and rambling enough that I could have given it a good fisking. Apparently since I’m 33 I’m too young to have an opinion and I’m just a “kid”. Since I’ve only been married once (for 10 years) that somehow means I’m wrong, too. Also, since I’m a co-owner of an LLC, that doesn’t count as owning my own business. (Okay, I’m going to have to take that one up with the IRS, because they sure think that it does).

 

His primary post was apparently linked back to my post about how Barack’s “Mandatory Volunteer” programs were bad, which I wrote several months ago. In that post that I mentioned that I’ve volunteered way more than Barack ever has. I said that I taught shooting for free, but Plowshare apparently thinks that isn’t really good enough.  He questioned what good was that for the community? (well, when one of my students shoots a rapist in the face, I call that “community activism” but Plow’s personal values may not coincide with mine)

 

Well, let me put this into perspective for you, Plow. I get paid really good to teach people to shoot. I’ve made $200 an hour before, which is like union plumber money. So when I waive the fee to teach a member of the Armed Forces, that’s less money that I’m making while still doing work. When I do hundreds of them, I’m still not making money. To put this into perspective, and to address your point using simple words that you can understand, I’ve given up something like $20,000 in free services this year. That’s money… and about 1000 times more than what Joe Biden has donated to charity.  On the 14th of this month, I’m teaching an entire platoon from one of our local NG battalions for free. (in normal person talk, that’s a lot of people)

 

He didn’t like my religious service much either, because he happens to disagree with me. But guess what, Plow, this is still America, where we are allowed to VOLUNTEER to do what we want to do. Hence, the word, VOLUNTEER. Wrap your little socialist brain around that. If you tell somebody what to do, and then penalize them when they don’t do it, that’s not volunteering anymore.

 

Now, I know giving up my time for something that I’m really good at doesn’t suit you, but I am really good at what I do. I’m an excellent firearms instructor, so I volunteer that which is of the most value to me. Now the Barack mandatory method would require me to needle-point sweaters for crack-whores at the ACORN rally while registering a bum to vote 72 times because some bureaucrat somewhere thought that was a swell idea.

 

Damn, I really wish Plow would have left that post up, because I don’t think you guys even realize how dumb it was. I read it when I first got to work and I was just itching to take it apart. Slow people trying to insult me gets my creative juices flowing. Alas, work got in the way, and by the time I got back to the interwebs, it was gone.  Oh well, hopefully this post will get him all riled up. Unless maybe he’s decided to move down another weight class and he’s looking to find some member of the Young Republican’s club to pick a fight with on Facebook.

Somebody on the internets doesn't like me…

I’m scratching my head over this one.

 

I found this link to my blog and followed it back. 

 

http://plowshareforge.blogspot.com/2008/09/lets-take-break-for-stupid.html

 

Apparently this guy doesn’t like me much.  I’m not really sure why, as apparently it has something to do with the fact that I despise the leadership of the Democratic party, but it isn’t really clear. He quotes a big bit from Mad Ogre, and then talks about how I’m his “protégé”.

 

Okay, whatever, but I’m not sure what the exact subject is supposed to be. For somebody who is apparently so much smarter than me, you would think he would include a reason for my apparent ignorance. 

 

I’m not exactly sure what galls him about Larry the goateed, Mormon, gun-shop employee” – Another one? Is this some sort of a fucking movement or what?”

 

I don’t know if it’s being Mormon, having a goatee, or working at a gun store, but something there apparently offends him.  Yep, I’m Mormon, proud of it.  I’ve had a goatee every day for the last fifteen or so years (mostly because I have Homer Simpson face and can grow a goatee in less than 48 hours), and I work at a gun store. (technically, I own the gun store, but whatever).

 

If he wanted to truly give me a good fisking, he should pick something I said and then poke holes in it. If he thinks I’m some sort of Republican apologist, he apparently hasn’t read this much, since my opinion of John McCain has always hovered somewhere around bat guano, but that still puts him ten million cool points ahead of Barack Obama, but that’s just because I’m racist… against Marxists.

 

I wouldn’t be too hard on him but for the fact he just grates on me.

 I would welcome him being hard on me, because maybe then I would have an idea what he’s talking about…

 

His stated purpose in his blog is on one hand quite legitimate. He wants to shill his book. No flies on that. Flogging the goods, that’s what I’m doing here (really).

I managed to take a minor self-published book, spam it across the entire internet, get onto a national best-seller list, and get a publishing contract with a major publisher, while every professional in the business told me I was sure to fail. Flogging. Check.

 

But his other purpose, to “make fun of stupid people”… God, he’s making it too easy.

 

If you’ve got the evidence that Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden are in fact, not stupid, I would love to see it.  Nancy is probably the single most ineffective congressional leader in the history of the US (and I’m a student of history, so I would like to hear ONE that’s been worse, ‘cause I sure can’t think of them). Harry is a hypocrite of the highest order, who I hold in special loathing because he’s supposedly in my same religion, while being the leader of the party that champions killing 40 MILLION kids a YEAR.  Both of these highly intelligent leaders are on public record saying how the war in Iraq was lost, and then immediately saying that they supported the troops.  Go Team! Too bad you’re gonna LOSE!

 

Your presidential nominee is a smooth-talking socialist who wants to take money from the productive and give it to every social program you can imagine. His background is as a community agitator. His mentors and friends are criminals, terrorists, and the least crazy one just plain hates white people.  His running mate wrote the assault weapons ban, and this is while he’s now telling us he supports our 2nd Amendment rights to hunt ducks.

 

This good blogger bashed Mad Ogre because he voted for George Bush.  Dude, I voted for George Bush. Doesn’t mean I like him a whole lot. But I would still take him over Al Gore (destroy the economy for a global crisis that may not actually exist, and if it does, we may or may not have anything to actually do with it) or John Kerry (gee whiz, another east coast elitist prick, who wants to tax us to death and take away our firearms, what a winning combo).

 

If I grate on you, I’m going to try to turn that up to a friggin’ belt-sander. I’m no Republican shill. I’m a Conservative. That means that I mistrust the government, and am of the firm belief that anything they touch turns to crap. So does George Bush suck? Yeah, a lot, primarily when he acts like a Liberal. But that whole killing terrorists thing falls under providing for the common defense, and he does that way better than the schlubs the other side keeps nominating. 

 

The sad fact is, if your people were running the show, Iraq would be a smoking hole, and the bad guys would be here.  In reality, we won, we killed piles of them. I’m actually looking at taking a contract admin gig for a couple of months in a place that Harry Reid, less than 6 months ago, was ready to cede to the bad guys. 

 

We have an energy crisis because the Democrats have stood firmly in the way of using our own resources.  We’re in a financial crisis because most Democrats and a fat share of Republicans who flunked Econ 101 have mandated stupid behavior on the part of financial institutions. (and if you want to call me stupid about that, I spent 6 years as a financial analyst for a Fortune 500 company. I would love to tell you just how useful Sarbanes-Oxley actually is.)

 

I don’t care for George Bush because of things like what we’re seeing this week.  I’m a capitalist. If a business fails, it deserves to fail, and have its assets bought by somebody smarter. When you prop up stupid behavior for years and years, eventually there will be a correction.  We’re seeing that correction now. If government had stayed out of this to begin with, then we wouldn’t be seeing the massive problem we are now. But when you dam the river, with bigger and bigger dams, when it fails, it is going to be a doozy. With the government not jumping in all the time, we would see a constant punishing of stupidity and rewarding of smarts.  But when the government gets involved, it mandates stupidity, punishes the smart, and then takes their money to give to crack whores.

 

So if you’ve got a problem with me, Plowshare, please, bring it to the table. I would love to hear how awesome the Democrats are. Personally I think they suck beyond all comprehension, and the Republicans are slightly less offensive.