How to Write Your Author Bio

Today Producer Jack asked us for bios to put on the Writer Dojo website (Steve and I have recorded the first 9 episodes so we’ll be launching pretty soon).

I wrote this –

Larry Correia is the New York Times bestselling author of twenty-five novels. He’s best known for his Monster Hunter International urban fantasy series, the Saga of the Forgotten Warrior epic fantasy series, the Grimnoir Chronicles alternate history trilogy, the Dead Six military thrillers, and the sci-fi Gun Runner. He’s also written over sixty pieces of shorter fiction, many of which are included in his Target Rich Environment collections, and he has edited three anthologies. He has won numerous writing awards, including three Dragon Awards, and two Audies, as well as being nominated for other awards like the Campbell, Hugo, David Gemmell fantasy award, and the Julia Verlanger. Larry’s novels are published in seven languages, and two of his properties have been optioned for television. He lives in Yard Moose Mountain, Utah with his wife, children, and fearsome Krasnovian Waffle Hound.

Okay, now with that mandatory BS out of the way, since Writer Dojo is an educational podcast to help authors make a go of this business, let me break down what I just did there, and what I was trying to accomplish.

A bio is all about establishing street cred, pertaining to whatever event/item that particular bio is for. I’ve got a bunch of different kinds for different things.

As you appear in various things you’ll be asked to provide an author bio. First thing you want to do is find out what the expected size is. Nobody wants to be the oddball in the program who has got the bio that’s wildly different in size than everybody else (unless you are the super star, then you don’t need one, but those guys also don’t need any professional advice from me either!)  Fluff the bio size up and down according to the parameters.

There is nothing worse or that comes off as more needy than the new guy who has clearly done zilch, with the program bio that takes up a whole page telling you about his 3 short story sales and how he’s the world’s leading expert on traditional Mesoamerican goat cheeses, while across from that dude is a super star whose bio reads “I’m that guy who writes books and stuff”. Because then the newb looks like he’s trying too hard. And people instinctively hate try hards.  

So first, establish the basics, who are you and what have you done? If you’ve written a bunch of books, say so. If you are there because you are astronaut, lead with that! If you’ve only written a couple of things, skip the total, because it doesn’t sound as impressive, and go straight into the title list.

I always put New York Times bestseller as early as I can. Personally, I believe the Times list is rigged nonsense, that plays favorites for its friends and bumps off anybody they don’t like, usually because of politics. Their methodology of how the list is calculated is secret for a reason. However it sounds super prestigious to people who don’t know any better, which is why those of us who’ve blundered into that status will lead with it.

If you’ve got any other things like that, they work too, but the NYT is the famous one. You’ll see USA Today bestseller (I’ve got that one) or Nielsen Bookscan (got that one too, and it’s actually the most accurate of all these inaccurate things, but it’s also the least well known to the general public, and thus most useless for bio purposes unless its aimed at industry types). I see a lot of Amazon bestsellers now, but they’ve got so many categories that anybody can hit #1 if your book gets lumped into a tiny enough micro genre. So that one is starting to get overused, so if the audience is pros, skip it, but if it’s newbs, run with it.

(sad part of Amazon’s bestseller system, it takes me thousands of books sold fast to hit the top of urban fantasy, and I somehow have to squeak past the guy selling 15 books for a dollar, but hitting #1 in Quick Reads About Left Handed Basket Weaving, you sell like four copies, and we’re both truthfully #1 bestsellers)

Then I go into the series list, because I’ve got ongoing and complete series. If I only had a few books, I’d accentuate those instead. If I’d only appeared in anthos and done some short stories, I’d try to fluff that up. However, don’t over fluff and over inflate your meager resume, because then it makes you sound desperate. People love rooting for the new guy or scrappy underdog, unless you sound desperate, then they instinctively dislike you. Don’t do that.

If you have too many titles, don’t list them all, because if there’s twenty plus titles in italics sitting there, readers just start to skim. I like to use series instead, but even then I’m starting to get too many, so you’ll run into the skim thing. So depending on the length I’m shooting for I’ll drop off the less famous ones.

For this one I added genres to the series list. Why? Because for this particular bio I’m trying to establish that I’ve got broad experience. This bio is for a writing podcast where I’m supposed to be the more experienced one, so writing in multiple genres shows that I’m not a one trick pony who just writes monster books.

For this one because I’ve got some room and I’m trying to establish expertise, I also put in my short fiction (because the number and having multiple collections sounds impressive to regular readers) and then the awards. If I have less space, I ditch the awards first, because they matter the least. I put the Hugo in there just out of spite, because I despise that award and everything it has turned into now, and the Campbell isn’t even called the Campbell anymore because that wasn’t woke enough. But whatever. We’ll record an episode about awards one of these days.  

TV tie ins make you sound cool and accomplished, even if in reality your odds of getting an option made into an actual show are still like winning the lottery. Foreign sales and translations make you sound international and worldly. Like holy moly, his books are in French and German? Then he must be super famous. Not really, I’m just a mid-lister there. But remember, the bio is all about perception.

If there’s a reason to buff up my professional expertise, then you’ll see authors drop in their professional/life experiences. If you’ve got something that makes you unique and memorable, you throw out that you were a champion bull rider, an F-14 Tomcat pilot, or they based the movie Roadhouse on you. That’s awesome. Run with that.

However, tread carefully, because some things will make you sound awesome, and others will just make you sound lame. If I’m going the previous life work experience route I’ll say something like “as a former accountant, machinegun dealer, firearms instructor, Larry is blah blah blah”. Why? Because depending on the audience, machinegun dealer or firearms instructor makes it sound like I might not totally fuck up the action scenes.

But don’t lie! There is nothing sleazier or more annoying than some dude who super inflates his backstory. There are some legendary cases where authors took their regular military backgrounds (which any job there is great, because you signed up, went where they sent you, and there’s no shame in being the guy who kept the computers running because somebody had to do it!) but the author twisted their bio into them being the Perched Like A Falcon On The Tip of The Spear In The Global War On Terror Special Operator Operating Operationally. Which of course will thrill the ignorant but guaranteed that guys who recognize bullshit will see right through that, and within 30 minutes they’re having a phone call with some of your former bosses to find out what you actually did for a living. And that shit’s gonna haunt the rest of your career.

Authors lie, embellish, and exaggerate for a living, but don’t go full dumb ass in your bio, guys. It’s just sad.

One of my old bios that’s floating around out there that Baen wrote for me, they had me down as a movie gun prop master. I hate that, and I’ve tried to get it replaced/deleted whenever I see that old one still floating around, because I sold guns used as movie props, but I was never a prop master on a movie set. Same thing as when my bio says I was a military contractor. True. I was. Except “military contractor” makes some people think of door kicking mercenaries, except I only did spreadsheets.

Now the last bit is where people will usually put in some personal thing about their lives to try and make the reader feel connected and humanize the author. The less an author has actually written, the more they’ll tend to fluff up the personal stuff. Like the author who lists all their multitude of pets. It’s a bad cliché. Hence me sticking my dog in this one as an example, and look, he’s a silly made up breed, ergo I must be fun and quirky! Sigh.

Having a bit about how you are a human being with family, hobbies, whatever, that’s great. Just don’t over do it. Some authors go downright silly. That’s fine depending on what the bio is aimed at. Fun, fannish event, then bragging about your collection of Buck Rogers VHS tapes is great. Does it give professional street cred? Nope. I’ve won mini painting contests. That means dick at a book expo. There is actually a real GI Joe character based on me? Fucking awesome for the bio for ComicCon, that’s going in.  

Whatever you do, just don’t make that personal part sad. I’ve read some author bios where at the end I just felt sorry for them. Pity does not make people want to buy your product. If a one or two paragraph bio is a major downer I’m sure as shit not buying their books. Do not ever do the woe is me thing. Your bio should be about positivity/success. Maybe there’s some situation where you’d want to accentuate your loser status or victimhood points, but that sounds miserable, and I’m glad I don’t run in those circles.

Bios are stupid, annoying, but also necessary. Luckily the more you accomplish, the more you can work with. It’s sorta like a resume. Starting out, your resume is fluff and jibberish, like how your first job at Burger King is described as: a team oriented motivated problem solving in a high speed environment of synergy supervising potato based food systems, and everybody knows that’s bullshit because it’s fucking Burger King. It’s the same thing as when some guy writes 200 words about his one short story publication. The audience knows that’s really just Burger King fry cook (and there’s nothing wrong with that, because we all started somewhere).  

Things get a little trickier when they want a big bio. This is for something like you’re the Guest of Honor at something, and they want one or two whole pages about you. On those, you’re a writer, go nuts. People are paying to see you. You can do what you want. Get personal. Get detailed as you feel like. Same thing as your bio on your personal page. The About Me on this blog kinda turned into a life story journal writing exercise, but whatever, I had fun with it.

In conclusion, know your audience. Establish your cred. Be proud of your accomplishments. Don’t make shit up. Have fun.

How stupid are File 770 readers? Stupid Enough to Believe Zuckerberg –

So yesterday I posted about how I got banned from Facebook again (always good for a laugh), and of course, because he’s a blood sucking parasite, Mike “I got caught using Chinese bot farms to boost my pathetic traffic to seem more important than I actually am so I can bully and intimidate gullible writers, but will scream that it is because racism if anybody refers to me as China Mike” Glyer posted about it on his trash gossip column site (File 770) which caters to social justice wankers and other assorted dipsticks who’ve lampreyed on to the publishing business.

Now normally, I would take the time to remind Mike Glyer to keep my name out of his whore mouth, by calling him all sorts of names and making sure the top google results for his name are all posts about me insulting him, but I’ve got a deadline and am leaving on book tour soon. So instead I’ll just take this moment to savor how incredibly fucking stupid his average reader is… to clarify, human reader, because the Chinese Robots he pays for are way smarter.

(I’ve got one fan who routinely reads that shit tier website who sends me funny stuff like this. I truly don’t know how he does it. He probably lost his sense of smell in an industrial accident, or maybe his other hobby is collecting dung beetles or something. But anyways, thanks Chris, you glutton for punishment.)

I said something like Facebook is the defacto propaganda arm of the DNC/Corpo-uni Party, so –

Oh my gosh? How could I ever possibly believe that Facebook is in bed with the DNC?

Uh… current events and this week’s White House press conference?

And before the gaggle of sub-moronic fucksticks at Vile 666 start reflexively barfing up some gas lighty nonsense about how that’s clearly fake news, they should probably look up who blue checkmark journalist Glenn Greenwald is (not exactly a conservative right winger!) or they could actually listen to the White House press secretary as she describes how the White House tells social media what messages to censor.

And there’s also the part where Mark Zuckerberg has been dragged before congress a few times now (and he sits on a cushion to see over the table) to describe how his giant soulless megacorporation totally doesn’t carry water for the DNC, it’s just that he has to shut down all the badthinkers with their fake news, and the definition of fake news is anything that disagrees with current democrat talking points, or news which somehow makes democrats look bad.

Kinda like how Facebook fact checkers said that the Hunter Biden laptop was fake up until after the election (whoops!) and how there was absolutely zero chance Covid originated in a Wuhan bio-lab (whoops!) or pick from two hundred other topics where Facebook went out of its way to squash various stories that made democrats look bad.

It’s not like Facebook fact checks or blocks narratives that make republicans look bad, no matter how outlandish the claims. This discrepancy has been covered a lot. The 2018 Congressional survey confirmed this bias, and that was a year before they went really nuts with it.

Facebook’s bias has been repeatedly confirmed and talked about in public by Facebook employees, up to and including the head of Instagram. The only place that doesn’t admit this bias is Facebook’s Official Committee To Make Sure We’re Not Biased which thoroughly checked itself and declared that it found no evidence it had done anything wrong. Trust us.

This bias is super painfully obvious and recognized by half the country. It’s so bad it’s a running joke. And in the other half of the country everybody smarter than Mike Glyer’s oozing genital warts knows it too, but admitting that in public would be bad for their side’s attempts to control every institution in society, so they pretend not to.

So with all that you’ve got to ask yourself, how incredibly fucking stupid do you have to be to think that Facebook isn’t helping the democrats? But as a rule of thumb, when dealing with Mike Glyer’s howling moonbat brigade, it’s safe to assume they’re dumb AND dishonest, so you can’t really go wrong.

There you go, Glyer. Another link you can share to continue being a useless parasite attached to the cancerous taint of fandom.

EDIT: Guess who else keeps up on current events better than Glyer’s idiot readers? The Attorney General of the United States of America, because I just saw – AG Garland concerned over Jen’s Facebook comments, said WH is treading onto “terribly thin ice,” per WH official

You know you done fucked up when you’ve gone too far authoritarian-statist for a democrat AG to handle. 😀

Fun With the Oversight Board -Or- better sign up for the newsletter Before I get perma-banned

Would you guys do me a favor and share this, because I sure can’t. 😀

So I got banned from Facebook again, shocker. I believe this is my 7th or 8th 30 day ban. But this is the first time I got the option to appeal to the not at all Orwellian sounding “Oversight Board”. As you can see, I was totally polite and honest in my responses.

Facebook is a time suck garbage site that exists as the propaganda arm of the DNC/Corpo-Uni-Party, to spy on you to sell to advertisers, and to steal everyone’s personal information. After bamboozling all the content creators to go over there to build “community” they now hold them hostage because the content creators are scared to leave because they’ll take a financial hit (The Oatmeal’s got a great cartoon about it).

But I’ve got a pretty good system going. Come back from a ban, plug some stuff, remind people to sign up for my newsletter, piss off a statist, and get banned for another month. I’m thinking that maybe this response to the Oversight Board might earn me a perma-ban and then I can actually get some work done. 😀

I’m not joking about the hostage thing though. It’s fucking malicious and scummy. It was a multi-year bait and switch while everybody directed all their fans over and put most of their media presence in one convenient place that promised to be “community” but which turned out to be a sleazy trap of social engineering for profit. And now they all feel stuck helping a company that actively lies and hides truth behind propagandist “fact checks” (remember when fact checks said Hunter Biden’s laptop was fake, there was zero chance Covid came from a lab, and the idea of election fraud was just wacky conspiracy theories? Pepperidge Farm remembers)

When you do bail out completely (last time I did that for 3 months) you do actually take a financial hit because it’s still the place that reaches the most customers (even if they are only showing it to like 10% of the people who WANT to follow you). “Nice business you’ve got going here, be a real shame if something violated our community standards. You’d better pay up so we might maybe show it to another 10% of the people who want to follow you, if we feel like it.” So it’s a really awful way to try and reach customers.

So seriously guys, if you follow me over there and want to know about my new books, swag, products, or deals, sign up for the mailing list and make sure it’s not going to your spam folder, because the clock is ticking. I’m kinda shocked I’m not perma-banned yet.

Plushy Wendell update

Hey all- Jack Wylder here with your 10 week Plushy Wendell update; this week was our target to have them in hand so I thought I’d take a moment to bring you up to speed. As it stands right now, they ARE in production and we’re hopeful they’ll be done soon. Stupid Rona has slowed down every type of manufacturing and sadly we get no special exceptions. We’re as eager to get these out as you are to receive them! We’ll update you again as soon as there is anything to report. Hang in there- you’re not forgotten and things are moving forward. Thanks