Facebook and the J-Word

-Jack here, once again archiving one of Larry’s rants from the Book of Faces. It seems they are not fans of the J Word these days…


If I use The J Word on Facebook right now Facebook throttles the shit out of it. (See my last post). FB really doesn’t want to talk about how bastions of liberalism talk a big game about diversity and inclusion, but then everything they control inevitably turns to shit and chaos with angry mobs threatening to murder and burn stuff .

Democrats simply can’t run things for very long without fucking it up. Their fundamental basic philosophy is based on tearing down society and replacing it with magic unicorn farts. The transition period between reality and imaginary utopia is the part where people die and everything sucks.

For my friends of the religion which this giant evil mega corporation doesn’t like us talking about what’s being done to you right now, I think it behooves you to-

A. Move away from the big blue cities.

B. Buy guns.

C. Learn how to use those guns.

D. Stop voting for the evil shits who love gun control, violent criminals, and angry mobs, so that those nice areas you can flee to which still have cute traditional stuff like “equal protection under the law” so Ilhan Omar’s brother-husband can’t just have you decapitated in the school library with impunity, stay nice and traditional.

As a block 80% of you guys keep voting for the dumbfucks who enable the assholes who want to MURDER YOU. Stop voting for that shit! Yes. The other party sucks in other ways but at least they are big on letting you shoot back at the people WHO WANT TO MURDER YOU.

If you don’t do anything else, at least do B and C, because if you live in a big blue city with a big blue mayor and a big blue police chief, they do not give a fuck if you get murdered or hate crimed, but by golly they will do their best to make sure none of the angry mob gets offended by any hurtful words during the press conference. Sure. The big blue prosecutor will still send you to big blue prison for daring to defend yourself (you voted to make that illegal remember?) but at least you aren’t dead. Yet.

Quit voting for this bullshit! We had the same discussion with another demographic voting block that votes 80% D a few years back when their democrat police chiefs and democrat mayors let their democrat mobs burn down democrat business and democrat neighborhoods because they felt democrat prosecutors and democrat run police departments were extra mean to certain color democrats… and the obvious solution to this was republicans are racist, explained the democrat professors who are currently part of the angry mob protesting the religion who FB says shall not be named on democrat college campuses. What a mystery that all this wacky social division keeps happening!

Fucking duh.

This rant brought to you by my disgusted reading of the news this morning, and multiple conversations with my friend M.A. Rothman in Las Vegas this week about the goofy state of our world and what guns we are gonna stockpile next.

Book Signing in Layton UT (at a gun store!) on 11/21
A Review of Monster Hunter Memoirs: Fever

52 thoughts on “Facebook and the J-Word”

  1. It seems to me the Democrats have some sort of compulsion to reward failure and punish success. ‘Jooos’ are, by and large, successful, so they must be punished. A lot of black people are failures, mostly because of stupid Democrat social policies, so they must be rewarded. Of course, any blacks who reject those policies and succeed must be punished!
    ———————————
    Today, every child in America is born $139,000 in debt.

    1. “A lot of black people are failures, mostly because of stupid Democrat social policies”

      Weird how they still fail in every other country that isnt run by American democrats (including their own) Racism or something I guess..

      1. }}} Weird how they still fail in every other country that isnt run by American democrats (including their own) Racism or something I guess..

        I suspect it’s because even when they are in “other countries”, they tend to have gotten sold on PostModern Liberal policies as A Real Good Thing.

        I mean, Japan went all in on it for about 20y after their boom, as it generally does, went bust, and collapsed… Those liberal economic policies kept them in financial doldrums, post-correction, for far longer than Conservative policies would have.

        I’d also note that Nigerian-Americans actually rank 3rd in median income, after the French and someone else (I forget).

        Seems that Nigerian-Americans have one of the highest Masters Degree percentages of any group of “X”-Americans. ..

        An Education and a good work ethic seems to be a good thing regardless of your skin color. Works for Indians, Works for “Orientals”, and it works for Jews.

        Whoodathunkit?? Go figure. :-/

        1. “I mean, Japan went all in on it for about 20y after their boom, as it generally does, went bust, and collapsed… Those liberal economic policies kept them in financial doldrums, post-correction, for far longer than Conservative policies would have”

          Can’t argue with that but I’d still rather live in Tokyo than Lagos.

        2. Reminds me of some of Jason Cordova’s books in the 4 Horsemen Universe of Chris Kennedy Publishing

          One of his MCs, founded a mercenary company in Nigeria, in order to help Nigeria. He was born in Nigeria, somehow found his way to the USA, cried not just at the sheer difference in wealth but the sheer difference in culture

          He came back to Nigeria and founded that mercenary company…..he then got continuously screwed over by the Nigerian Government that wanted bribes and nepotistic promotions for their relatives in said company. He could have relocated to Cairo, but he was loyal to his country, well more specifically his people….didn’t see eye to eye with the highly corrupt government that didn’t share his goals of actually helping the country both economically and socially/culturally

      2. There’s too much war and conflict in those countries, in part because, I think people use “African” and their nation names as blanket terms

        Think of it this way, there is a country named Nigeria, but there is no Nigerian people, just lots of tribes suddenly grouped together

        Even worse, there maybe an interest for both big elites in and outside of those African countries to keep them poor and dangerous

        It’s a constant age of chaos and poverty for their populations, but also an “age of plenty” for The Elites who prosper so much they have no worry if their countries are wrecked in part because wrecking them is part of the way they get so much wealth and power

        And when people have problems, whether they be lacking food or be complaining about how some Christian baker refuses to make an erotic wedding cake, they look to their “leaders” in part because they can’t/won’t take charge of their own lives and if they do….they’re not long for this world

      1. You assume incompetence, but these days I am pretty sure those Rs and Ds are labels

        They don’t truly give a damn about anyone, their career politicians and play out scripts and will get big fat checks and vacations when everything is all said and done

        Hell, the orange man went to WEF, the World Economic Forum

        If you go deeper into any “crazy conspiracy theories” you’ll be surprised that even guys like George Bush and Ronald Regan are suspected of engaging in some really big “gentleman’s clubs” for psychopaths and wannabe masters of the universe

  2. Democrats have two games going on:

    1. Punitively tax the most successful and productive people in society, and use it to reward the least successful and productive people. This takes several names: Welfare, Social Safety Net, “Wealth Redistribution”, “Buying Votes”, etc.

    2. Convince most of those people that Republicans are Satan incarnate, and a vote for them is a vote for racism, bigotry, hate speech, clowns, global warming, poverty, higher taxes, military/martial law, explosive diarrhea, scary guns, and a million other things that realistically are far more likely to happen under Democrat rule.

    The first one is easy. All it takes is a simple legislative majority, which if you own the big cities is trivial.

    The second, though, they’ve elevated to an art form, with the help of a compliant media willing to carry water and stay on-message, and social media platforms run by fellow Democrats and the Chinese Communist Party.

    On Facebook, mentioning the J-word* is verboten. Meanwhile, on CCP-operated TikTok, influencers are actively encouraging their audiences to search for, read, absorb, and empathize with Osama Bin Laden’s “Letter to America”.

    Y’know, because convincing a generation of young people who weren’t around for 9/11, that America deserved 9/11, has no possible negative outcomes for us. [/sarcasm]

    If I didn’t know better, they’re trying their hardest to prevent another 9/12 — that brief period in which there was no racism, no class warfare, when everyone proudly flew the American flag, and for the first time in generations we were truly united as one people. Democrats (and foreign influences hostile to America) NEED division, conflict, and strife; they’ll do whatever it takes to keep it going because it keeps them in power.

    ———
    * – How JK Rowling can we get this? The Religion-That-Must-Not-Be-Named? Matzah-Eaters? Joo-Know-Who?

    1. Archer, common (((euphemisms))) include Tiny Hats and Skypes. The latter is specifically designed to foil the central control impulse of social media companies, under the theory that censoring mentions of competitors could get them in trouble with regulators for anti-competitive behavior; so there are other terms in that schema for similarly muffled discussions, e.g. using Googles for blacks.

    2. }}} * – How JK Rowling can we get this? The Religion-That-Must-Not-Be-Named? Matzah-Eaters? Joo-Know-Who?

      Well, one dirty trick is to make use of the full Unicode characterset. Go to accessories and pull up Character Map tool:

      Ĵéŵş — ɺȇωιṣḫ — ᴊủᵭḁḭṧṁ

      I do this all the time to bypass excessive Bowdlerization.

      Obviously, it’ll need testing, but I’ll bet they don’t recognize those as the words they are clearly meant to be.

      After that, you’ll need to make euphemisms, but it’s a start at combating their computer-based censorship.

      1. I see people doing that on F*ceb**k all the time. I just never have the patience for it — and I rarely post anything I’m not selling on Zuckerberg’s Most Amazing FedGov Narc & Propaganda Emporium anyway.

    3. You’re forgetting 3) Regulatory Capture

      The companies they say they tax and regulate, they end up working very closely with them and at times even fund them

      Eisenhower warned of “the military industrial complex”….it’s just that contrary to fiction, it’s less formidable a war machine than one would think

      Especially now that the USAF finds that the average citizen’s too obese, too lazy or too drug addicted to join and those who aren’t, probably know they’ll be screwed over

      Governments paying big companies for subpar and/or spyware-filled products/services to sell to you, which you again buy

  3. ‘Oppression made me do it!’ That’s not just Hamas’ excuse, that’s the excuse of the whole SJW crowd. Any oppression, whether real or perceived, no matter how monstrous or picayune it was, no matter how far back in time it happened or how often it occurred, is justification for ANY action they take; doxxing, firings, beatings, mass slaughter, etc. And if you question that action, that in of itself is oppression and justifies violence against the questioner.

    I would deal with them all like I would deal with Warhoons, both north and south, were they to trespass on my realm; but then I’m just a bloodthirsty Barsoomian monarch, so that’s my excuse.

  4. No one gets murdered for burning a Torra. There are few negative consequences for mocking Judaism. 80% of Jews don’t seem to be willing to change party

    The milk is free. No reason to take any risk for the cow. There are few,if any negative consequences (yet) for the current position. Going the other way has obvious, often quick, consequences.

    It may explode and cause all manner of evil later on, but the people making the calculation will have theirs and maybe be out of office by then. Heck, most voters won’t even remember what happened beyond who’s this year’s…Goldstein.

    1. “There are few negative consequences for mocking Judaism. ” Tell that to Mel Gibson, et al.

      To know who is in charge, find out who you may not mock.

      1. Dude, Mel Gibson is still one of the top ten richest and most successful directors in Hollywood, with a net worth somewhere close to half a billion.
        That bump in his career was also accompanied by a very public DUI AND a rather famous tape of him yelling at his ex-wife that turned into a big domestic violence scandal.
        But suuuuuuuuure, the Jews run the world. Run with that.

      2. To know who is in charge, find out who you may not mock.

        So…. George Soros, the Clintons, and the Bidens. And more generally, POCs and Islamists.

        Sounds about right.

      3. So, Mel Gibson has decades of Anti-semitism (first reference I found was referring to a jew as an “oven dodger in 96).

        After that he appeared in 13 films before the next incident I could find in 2006.

        *I’ll skip Passion of the Christ, as that is more controversial rather than clear cut “I hate Jews”. (note, I’m not attempting to minimize this its just…more complex than other issues given larger socio-religious context).*

        2006 he is recorded blaming Jews for all the wars in the world.

        – Since then he has been in 21 movies and directed or produced 5 films.

        I’m not sure how much of a negative consequence THAT is. I could only afford to be punished so badly for my failures as a human.

        1. It probably kicked him out of “A list lead”, but he’d have gotten out of there pretty quick anyway. Rare is the actor that stays as a primary lead for decades.

        2. I’m not sure I’d classify Passion of the Christ as overtly anti-Semitic anyway. It’s the Gospels, portrayed on the big screen. Taken as a history, yes, the Hebrews pushed Pontius Pilate to crucify Jesus even after being found innocent of any real crime.

          But that’s what the Bible says happened. Mel Gibson didn’t just make it up out of whole cloth. Calling the movie “anti-Semitic” is like labeling any mention of the Holocaust “pro-Nazi”.

          On top of that, the Hebrew populace was merely fulfilling their role in God’s plan; Jesus had to die innocent as a sacrifice for the sins of mankind. If the Hebrews hadn’t had Jesus crucified, there would be no salvation through Him.

          If talking about or portraying the Gospel story in any way is “anti-Semitic”, then Christianity, the New Testament, and God Himself are anti-Semitic. (And so is half the Old Testament, a.k.a. the Torah, a.k.a. the Jews’ own holy book. Do you know how many nations Joshua and his army wiped out? Just because God sanctioned and commanded it doesn’t make it any less of a genocide.)

          Now, this isn’t to excuse Mel Gibson from any other anti-Semitic comments he may have made. It’s just that Passion of the Christ is a poor example because of the source material: in that particular story, the Hebrews were the bad guys — at least on the surface — but they also served a higher purpose.

          ———
          As a side note, crap like this is how history gets forgotten: label stuff as “offensive”, “triggering”, “anti-[something]”, or “[something]-phobic”, and use that label to prohibit it from being taught, shown, displayed, portrayed, or passed down in any form.

          And we all remember what they say about people who fail to learn from their history, right?

  5. Okay, so we’re ignoring the fact that Facebook is run by a jewish guy? For at least the last 20 years that specific group have taken issue with being called Jew/Jews. From what I understand “Jewish people” is their preferred term. Not trying to shit on your porch but come on mate.

    1. }}} From what I understand “Jewish people” is their preferred term. Not trying to shit on your porch but come on mate.

      Yeah, you seem to be succeeding against your constipation pretty well. :-/

      There is a class of Liberal Jews who are far more liberal than Jewish, And, being liberal idiots, they have an easy time of believing in two different, conflicting ideas at one time, and applying the convenient one at will.

      Among those mutually exclusive concepts this specific lot holds is the idea that their being “Jewish” does not matter as long as they deny it themselves, and, much more critically, that that will matter to the anti-Semitic forces when they come home to roost. They themselves hate being Jewish, and think that is going to matter when being Jewish becomes a reason to lose your civil rights.

      Just because he’s nominally Jewish doesn’t mean shit. Because HE thinks it does not.

      1. There are practicing Jews, and then there are JINOs (Jews in name only.)

        It’s the JINOS, often family or actual Holocaust survivors, who tend to say they’re Jewish but vote for every damned leftist socialist idea and politician, because “it will never happen here.”

        Serious ‘D’oh’ moment many are now getting.

      2. I think you missed my point mate. I’m 90% sure I know where where Andrew Anglin lives. I can hook you up if you want to suck him off?

    2. A. Go check yourself. Facebook is throttling the shit out of the topic.
      B. It is cute you think the mega-leftist billionaire is 1. Religious. 2. Running the day to day operations of Facebook’s censorship department.
      C. Don’t call Jews, Jews? Fuck off with your “preferred term”. I don’t know what kind of candy ass Jews you hang out with, but I’ve never had a single friend of mine take offense off of them being called by the same name they’ve been called for the last couple thousand years.
      D. You might not be trying to shit on the floor, but you certainly left a pile here.

      1. Facebook throttles all sorts of things. It throttled me for trying to put together a *synthesis* of conservative and environmental goals. Even creative moderates get the silence treatment.

        Plus, “Suggested for You” crappe squeezes out just about everything else.

        Facebook needs to be replaced with a non commercial service which allows users to control their feeds.

  6. From my (limited apocryphal) experience J’s as a whole don’t vote left any more than other W’s. The men have a spread of opinions and leanings about the same as other “civilised” western demographics. The women though, you’d be hard pressed to find a single one who doesn’t vote hard-left (like every other white woman, just more so). And … that’s why we see such stereotypes and results – the men vote across the board, but the women vote en-bloc, so it’s almost always a guaranteed win for whoever the women find “fashionable” (and “look all the j’s vote one way” even when they don’t).

    As I’ve ‘matured’ (I’m not old dammit) I’ve noticed that women (the collective) act almost like a flock, men (ditto) like a pack. Fitting in, doing/saying/thinking what the rest of the flock (decided by the mean-girls in charge) is the ultimate, and only aim for women. Being different means exclusion and social death to women, the ultimate crime and punishment.

    Men achieve leadership positions, power, influence and status from … ability (even if it’s just being the biggest/strongest). Women achieve such by … “relationships” (be it a clique, or more likely to a strong man). Meritocracy is overwhelmingly a male concept, fashion is female. To disagree, go against the flock means guaranteed loss of status, attack and exclusion (notice when a man attacks you he’ll punch you, when a woman attacks she’ll destroy your relationships and reputation).

    For good and reasonable ‘survival’ reasons women both act collectively, and submit to the strong. They expect (and need) to be protected, provided for so they almost all (there has to be the odd unicorn out there) vote for whoever will give them the most freebies (preferably without all that reciprocity and responsibility involved in marriage). [They aren’t stupid or evil, just selfish, narcissistic and short-sighted. They are acting entirely rationally, in their own interests, and don’t even see, let alone think about the consequences for culture, society or country].

    The left is mostly women, or men who want to be treated like women – cared for, provided for, protected, and given status for what they are, not what they do (is it any surprise that it’s leftist males who, noticing that even as leftists they aren’t as privileged as women, now demand to ‘be’ women?).

    My point? It isn’t just (or all) J’s. The “tribal” thinking and voting is across the board (with, being honest, the only people ‘not’ doing it being “white”, western, Christian men – with the predictable results we see daily. Look to what any “special interest group” and “minorities” do and what you’ll see is them … copying the feminists playbook). We all, in the west, now (and for decades) live in a de facto cultural matriarchy, the J’s (and their other well known stereotype) have it at home too, so is it any surprise they ‘appear’ more feminised?

    The more I learn, the more I realise, in giving women the vote we (western civilisation) committed (slow, painful) suicide. (I wish I was wrong, hope someone can dissuade me, but suspect I’m not).

    {I’m fully aware there are many women who don’t, and many men who do, fit those generalities. But … they are so notable precisely because they ‘are’ so rare and unusual. Stereotypes always have a core of truth in them, even if some dislike admitting it].

      1. That’s a very succinct way of saying you’re a white-knight (hoping some woman will notice how woke you are – hint: they probably already have and ignore you in favour of … actual men), a woman, or just possibly a deluded, but unaccountably lucky man who assumes because ‘his’ wife hasn’t acted that way ‘yet’ that all women are like her (when in reality she probably always does, but you daren’t notice).

        There are many women who don’t fit the stereotype, but just like those women who were doctors, lawyers, engineers and politicians ‘before’ the quotas, preferences and lowered standards, they were outliers and not even vaguely representative of the vast majority.

        1. Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel better about people like me who have a future because we have a partner willing to have our babies.

          1. A “partner”?! Oh dear, QED.

            I have a “wife” and, so far, four healthy, happy children. but your “partner” (and we all know who decided on the use of that term) may be “willing” (or claim to be to gain access to your wallet) but has she actually ‘had’ a child yet (and do you really think ‘you’ get to be a father, or even see them ‘when’ she grows bored with you and your man-bun and wussified act?).

            I’m guessing you’re young (in your twenties/thirties – because if you’re older and still hoping she’ll ‘allow’ you the privilege of being her sperm donor, you’ve already lost). You have a lot of growing up to do, and some painful experiences to come which ‘might’ allow you to actually wake up and see reality (instead of living your woke, wishful-thinking fantasy). I look forward to reading about that awakening, but suspect you’re too indoctrinated to do anything but believe it was your just punishment for not being woke enough.

  7. I don’t understand any group, Jewish or otherwise, that consistently supports and/or votes for political parties and organizations that have made it clear that they are intent on their destruction. As noted by many, Jews are about 80% collectivist/statist/authoritarian in their voting and support for the Dem-wing, and continue this support in the face of the horrific massacre perpetrated by Hamas…underwritten by the US Democrat Party through their proxy/masters Iran and China.

    Black unemployment hit record LOWS during the Trump administration, yet the black population in this country overwhelmingly support their continued slave masters, the Dem-wing. The “big white house on the hill” from Southern plantations is now the White House/Congress, where their policies subjugate them through massive influxes of other people’s money.

    The groups which are seen in the US supporting the targeted murder of children, women and elderly include gays (the Islamo-fascists would throw them from rooftops), the LGBTQRXYZ+ (they throw them from the roofs, drag the carcasses up and throw them off again multiple times just to be sure) who apparently have NO CLUE that the Islamo-whackoes actually mean what they say.

    The utter and complete silence of what is laughingly referred to as “women’s groups” here in the US tells you all you need to know. They were infiltrated (or in some cases started) as in-your-face Marxist fronts that have nothing what-so-ever to say about the subjugation of women in Islamic-law countries.

    They will not change either their non-thought patterns or voting patterns even as they are led to the cattle cars or rooftops.

    1. There was a piece on UnHerd about exactly that – why British women’s groups (and other “women’s” groups) are supporting Hamas despite all the evidence of what Hamas does to women. At least in Britain one reason given is there is a reasonable fear of physical violence if someone upsets the Muslims and Trans groups. OK, I can understand reticence at least. I didn’t enjoy getting beaten up when it happened to me. The others? They’ve been trained to support whoever claims victimhood the loudest. And then there’s the political grifters who make money from supporting the bad guys.

    2. It makes perfect sense if your god is Marxist Progressivism.
      In that religion, non-Western is more pure than Western*, because they’re less tainted by Bourgeoise Capitalism.
      So, in this situation, Hamas and other radical groups aren’t actually acting in accord with their own stated beliefs and purposes, but are REALLY fighting against Western Imperialism. If they should succeed, the Forces of History will turn them into good little Marxist, because they’ll have jettisoned all those things holding them back.

      *We’ll ignore the fact that the Marxist Claptrap is 100% Western.

    3. Think of it this way, it’s “an age of plenty”, the industrial revolution’s made people less and less necessary

      Even communist nations like China and Russia were nonplussed when things like the Holodomor occurred. Why? Because they would always have more than enough food for the Party Officials, the people cannot truly defend themselves, their people are too afraid of one another to think of fighting and even after the holodomor, there’s still more than enough to keep working and fighting

      And you’d be surprised how little people can be “satisfied” with. A proper job/means of living and a happy non-single mother household? Boring and even if it’s breadcrumbs, free food is still free food

      And NO ONE wants to actually take charge of their own lives. That’s too scary because it’s too outside of the global culture.

      Also, the Prussian Education System has had a hand in screwing over the minds of billions. WWII also gave Western Europe or Western Civilization a collective guilt spurred on by the Frankfurt School

  8. Some pundits have called out the large university donors that were withdrawing their donors in the aftermath of the Pro-Hamas marches and anti-J actions.

    Many donors and their ilk have been actively funding or accepting of racial divisions, civic destruction, immorality, and foreign wars heavily for the last two decades. Now that their “causes” and “pets” are turning against them, they want the same people they were denigrating and trying to destroy to come to their defense.

    They have sown the winds of nihilism and destruction while pretending to be gods.

  9. I wish things were simple, but they aren’t.

    Orthodox Jews do not vote for Democrats. They vote R, at a rate of about 75 percent, second only to White Evangelicals.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/05/11/u-s-jews-political-views/#:~:text=Three%2Dquarters%20of%20Orthodox%20Jews,their%20political%20views%20as%20conservative.

    Unfortunately, we do tend to live in blue areas, because the urban life provides us with some conveniences that are hard to live without. Synagogues within walking distance, mikvaot (ritual immersion pools), religious schools, kosher food, particularly meat, available nearby. Some religious communities in NJ and upstate NY have had issues with their nominally Republican neighbors when they’ve had to expand neighborhoods and towns on account of population growth (higher birthrates).

    Guns are an issue where things are changing, slowly.

    While I wish we could influence the Rerform, Conservative, and other “Denominations” of Judaism, it’s an uphill battle. When you replace a conservative faith like Judaism with the ideas of liberal democracy to the max and the vague, screwed up idea of “tikkun olam” which they’ve taken as “social justice,” we’re rarely speaking the same language.

    1. Orthodox Jews lean strongly Right, that’s true.

      But Reform Jews (e.g. “JINOs” [Jews in Name Only], “Leftists first, Jews a distant second”) vote ‘D’ so reliably that Democrats don’t even campaign for them — and in fact, often stump for policies directly against their interests — and still get their vote.

      The question is, what’s the ratio of Orthodox Jews to Reform Jews, that Orthodox would vote strong-majority ‘R’ but Jews in general still vote overwhelmingly ‘D’?

    2. Reminds me of Kurt Schlichter’s Kelly Turnbull series

      One of the things that weirded me out when I first read it, was that not just Christianity, but Judaism became a religion HIGHLY frowned upon in the “People’s Republic”

      And when it comes to the original Nazis, people barely know about WWII or the concentration camps and think the Nazis were a purely American rather than a German thing….and that was 1-2 decades after “The Split”

      Those JINOs, in all likelihood, barely ever go to the Synagogue or do anything religious, at most they just use some religious get up onscreen to show off somehow

  10. Give it time! The Orthodox have the reverse voting pattern from the rest of the tribe–75% republican, 60% self-describe as conservative (reference the Pew center)–and a birthrate at least twice as high as anyone else; do the math.

  11. Ah yes, selective ‘victimhood’… from the oppressors… Glad I’m west of the Mississippi, in a small town with like minded folks and a group of supporters who are also ‘gun nuts’…

    And no, they REALLY don’t want to try that crap in a small town…

  12. People are emboldened by numbers of their own kind. So if the Dems do bring over a bunch of Gaza “refugees”, then the pronoun crowd is in for a surprise as the ‘stinians show them what they think of liberal diversity.
    But I don’t have much sympathy for Darwin Award candidates. I just hope no one I care about is in the line of fire.

    1. I think like with Western Europe, they just barely ever interact with one another

      That’s kinda why the Culture Shock has yet to fully occur, otherwise it’s just fake news/propaganda or something VERY distant from their daily lives

      Those activists, really do NOT have that much experience with the world, both the good and the bad and the horrifying

      1. I drop Facebook over a decade ago and frankly other than writerdojo group I’ve felt no strong reason to go back. That said I glad it works for Larry and they stopped banning him every 5 minutes.

        1. Oh, they still de-list him and 30-day-ban him all the time.

          It’s just that his fans know how to look him up directly, so they can read his stuff even when the ZuckBook doesn’t allow it in their feeds.

          A lot of Right-leaning writers would gladly do away with it entirely, but there’s currently no viable replacement with similar reach. MeWe is the next-best thing, but it doesn’t have anywhere near the user base; one may as well be advertising on MySpace or Geocities.

          Until there is an alternative with similar reach, FauxBook is a necessary evil.

  13. Yeah, I’m only just now seeing MAR’s posts on FascistBook, after a long time of nonesuch. Assuming he was banned big time for a bit.

  14. If God’s covenanted people are eliminated, then its everyone else, then they murder themselves into self extinction. It’s a rage-roid, berserker-fueled hatred that never turns off until everyone including the perpetrator is dead. The ultimate anti-life ideology.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *