Anti-gun letter to the editor at Brandeis U.

I saw this letter to the editor posted on THR.  And I feel the need to make fun of somebody, and Jeffrey Dobereiner of Brandeis University, today is your lucky day.  If you were ever wondering about the state of higher education in America, here is your answer.  Apparently Brandeis has decided to arm their campus police.  (About friggin’ time, but this is from Massachusetts, so what do you expect?)


 His incoherent ramblings are in italics.  I’ve got to pick this apart, because this is perhaps one of the stupider things I’ve seen in quite some time. 

Better lighting and stakeouts more effective than pistols and bullets
By Jeffrey Dobereiner

Okay, just the title is a dead giveaway that the author is living in a magical fantasy world.  You’ve got a crime problem.  You stake it out and catch the bad guys, and then what?  No guns?  Take them into custody with your reason and debate skills?  This ain’t England.  Our criminals will eat you alive, and if you’ll notice, even Brit cops have access to guns now.  But I digress, let’s continue with this foolishness.

Obsessing over safety is by no means cool, but having to live in fear is quite unpleasant. I am forced to ask, then, why Brandeis Public Safety dedicates itself wholeheartedly to the wrong things, while leaving gaps which affect the student body.

Right off the bat, the author indicates that his brain isn’t firing correctly.  For you folks that flunked English 101, this paragraph is called Foreshadowing.   

Brandeis is a pretty safe campus. We don’t have security guards stationed in all of our dorms, we don’t have random ID checks, and we don’t need these things. We have the fastest parking ticket response time in the country, and we don’t need that either. But most of all, we don’t need officers with guns. 

Okay, Brandeis is so safe that cops don’t need guns, because, after all, bad things never happen at a school.  Jeffrey might not have a security guard stationed in his room, but I’m willing to bet that he sleeps in a bicycle helmet, and all the pointy corners in his dorm room have been taped over with foam padding.   In debate terms, what Jeff just did was set up what is known as a Strawman Argument.  This is where you state something absurd (random ID checks, guards in your room) and assign that belief to your opponent.  This is one of the lower forms of debate tactic, right above calling somebody a doody head. 

What threat could possibly strike our campus which would require our police officers to fire upon someone?

   Jeff, do you live in a cave?  Are you really that stupid?  Uhh… how about bad person needing to be shot?  I was going to bring up Virginia Tech for example, but the author brings it up himself below.  It is usually an indicator of a really stupid argument when in your own pitch, you bring up facts that make you look like an imbecile.

  Guns are tools of fear and intimidation, and the presence of officers wielding firearms will doubtlessly have a subduing effect on campus speech and student spirit.  

I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that our intrepid author wet the bed well into his teenage years.  I don’t know about you guys, but I can barely function when there is a gun present.  Which means since I’m usually wearing a .45 and work in a gun store, I spend a lot of time being intimidated and subdued.   

Recently, Andrew Meyer was tased relentlessly and without merit by campus police officers at the University of Florida, simply for asking too long a question of John Kerry.
   Actually, the tasing was a result of not doing what the cops asked him to do, which was leave the scene.  Then when he resisted and fought, he rode the lightening.  For a good analysis of this, go read Lawdog’s blog.  He can explain the merits far better than I ever could.  

Last year, UCLA police did the same thing to a student at the Powell Library because he wasn’t fast enough showing his ID. And that was non-lethal weaponry!  

  Point of order from somebody who sells this stuff, there is no such thing as non-lethal weaponry, only LESS-Lethal.  I could kill you with a pillow.  But I still don’t get what Jeff is getting to here, as these examples don’t have anything to do with cops having guns.

  Brandeis boldly skipped tasers, and went right from pepper spray to pistols.

Oh, there is his point…  And what a sad little point it is.  Because he found a couple of examples where cops used force against students, by his reasoning then surely his local cops are just going to skip over that whole Force Pyramid thing and shoot him for getting lippy.  Wow, they’ve got some really mean cops up there in Kennedy land. Now that is what is called a Logical Fallacy, which is a typical liberal way of looking at the world.   
This knee jerk reaction to the Virginia Tech tragedy involved little to no input from the students it claims to protect, and is being adopted far too hastily.   Uh, Jeff, I thought you couldn’t think of any reasons why we would need guns at school…   Hello… Crazy guy shooting people sounds like a heck of a good example to me.

  A small panel during the summer months, with student views represented by Union insiders, hardly qualifies as open dialogue.   

If by dialogue, you mean poorly-reasoned claptrap like the Brady propaganda you’re regurgitating all over yourself, then I can’t blame the panel at all.  Outrage and feelings don’t make you smart, and just because you have an opinion doesn’t mean you should share it, because frankly, my 7 year old can articulate a clearer argument than you have here.  

The answer to diminished gun violence is not more guns – it’s the implementation of better mental health facilities for the student body.   

And what if the next school shooter wasn’t a student, but just decided to walk onto campus… But Correia, that could never happen, and we’ll disregard all the times that has ever happened.  Besides, everybody knows that good mental health facilities are the answer to violence, which is why we don’t have violence anymore.  Ironically, some of my best students and customers are mental health professionals, apparently they know enough about crazy people to know to carry a gun.

  While the terrible actions of Seung-Hui Cho can’t be forgotten,   But people like you had already forgotten before the bodies had cooled…

  or overstated,   Jeff, I’m guessing you’ve never seen anyone shot in the face before.  Let alone dozens of people.  That’s kind of hard to overstate.  But I don’t live in Magic Fairytale Unicorn Land like you, so I wouldn’t know.

  giving our police more lethal weapons is not the way to prevent such an incident.  

For once, I agree.  Give the lethal weapons to the STUDENTS.  They’re the ones that will be there when the bad things happen.  Police can only respond after the fact.  Here in Utah, we’re not having an argument about arming cops, we’re arming students, faculty, and staff.   Oh, that concept ought to make Jeff’s poor brain explode.   Shockingly enough, we haven’t had any problems.  “Student Spirit” and other nebulous crap like that is doing just fine.  See, I missed out on the whole “Academic Expression” stuff, because I went to college to get a piece of paper that said I was entitled to get a job that paid better.  That was it.  I suppose the longer a person isolates themselves in the world of academia, where all opinions are equally valued, then the more idiocy, like this article, will make sense.  

 The police at Virginia Tech were, at the time of the massacre, carrying firearms.  And if the shooter had decided to fight them, instead of killing himself, how exactly were the cops supposed to deal with him?  Oh, I’m sure Jeff would have given Cho a hug, told him that everything was okay, and that they just needed to discuss his feelings in the sharing circle. 

 That is not to say there aren’t ways to make our campus a safer place to live.   

Yep.  Allow students with concealed weapons permits to carry guns, you idiot.  It works pretty damn well for us.

    Recently, there have been massive numbers of cars broken into in J lot and around the Charles River apartments. An officer told me that the break-ins are continuing, and as I walked back to my Grad today, I saw a friend of mine’s driver-side window knocked out. This means that there are criminals, presumably from off campus, coming here regularly. They have no fear of capture, and why should they? 

  Yes, because your unarmed police might be forced to yell “STOP!” or something.  I rolled my eyes so hard when I read that, that I think I injured myself.  

The few closed circuit cameras set up to watch our cars clearly aren’t cutting it. Ah, but, here’s what guns will do for us: Thief one: “Man, let’s rob the cars on the Brandeis Campus. We can go unarmed because those cops don’t have guns. We’ll just run if we’re seen.” Thief two: “Dude, I heard they’re going to start arming their cops with pistols.”

Thief one: “Well hell, I guess we’ll have to bring our guns, then!”

(High Five)

 Yes, because that is exactly how it works in the other 200,000 separate jurisdictions in the US that have armed cops.  I can’t hardly get to work because of all the gun fights cluttering up all the major intersections.   
We’re pumping $100,000 into weapons training and shiny pistols for our cops.  

 Oh my gosh, Jeff brings up a great point.  Holy crap.  I’m stunned.   $100 K is a lot.  They’re paying too much.  FBMG could outfit a PD of that size, with armor, guns, and training, for a lot less money.  Somebody on the Brandeis PD should give me a call.  

 With just one hundredth of that, I know how to stop the thief. Hire a security guard (or a ninja) to stand behind a tree near J lot. 

 Anytime ninjas are brought into an argument, I just keep on walking…     

When they see someone about to shatter a window have them run out and throw a net on the criminal!

   Yes, because the net is the best weapon ever for fighting crime, well, almost as good as the Bat-erang or Wonder Woman’s golden lariat.  Just a tip for people who want to write letters to the editor, see, at this point Jeff is just kind of rambling, and making himself look stupid.  If you are woefully ignorant of a topic, you really shouldn’t talk about it, at least not in a public place, where people will be tempted to beat you up and take your lunch money.

  Then they can call the Brandeis Police, and the problem will be resolved. 

  And if the guy resists, or pulls a gun, the PD can use Hug Therapy, or perhaps light some scented candles.   

  In all seriousness, paying a couple of officers overtime to stake out the parking lot would be prudent. 

 Oh good, he’s serious now.  For a minute, I thought that an American college student was actually dumb enough to believe this tripe. 

Overzealous security steps like giving pistols to our police officers don’t compensate for glaring oversights like a lack of sufficient cameras in J-lot, or low numbers of patrols. 

Only in a state that keeps on reelecting that bloated pimple, Ted Kennedy, could arming police officers with pistols be considered “Overzealous”.  In the rest of America, our cops are already armed, and we’re having this discussion with our state’s equivalent of Jeff about regular people carrying guns.   

The addition of firearms will make us less safe by bringing the number of guns on our campus from zero to many.  

 I’m not sure what Jeff’s major is, but it certainly isn’t math.   Let me break this down for you, Jeff.  I don’t know if you’ll be able to understand something that isn’t drawn in crayon, but the problem isn’t guns.  It is bad people who hurt good people.  I know in your academic world of moral equivalence, there is no such thing as good and evil, but in real life, there are bad men in the world who will hurt you and take your stuff, regardless of how you feel about it.   Bad guys with guns?  Bad.  Good guys with guns?  Good.   Now here is the tricky part.  Bad guys break laws.  I know this is shocking, but bear with me.  If I’m a bad guy, and I’m planning on committing 50+ murders and other capital crimes, and then killing myself, I don’t really care what your “Campus Safety Policy” says about guns on campus.  The only thing that is going to stop me is putting bullets into my vital organs until I leave you alone. Jeff, I hate to tell you this, but there are people in this world who will rape you to death, through your skull.  They’re bad, they’re tough, and they don’t give a shit about your school spirit or freedom of academic expression.  They’ll hurt you because it brings them pleasure. The only thing that protects people like you, from people like that, is people like me.  Deal with it, you pampered little ass-muppet.     Let’s allocate these resources to things that will actually make us safe, like better lighting on the sketchy walk to J-lot. Or a ninja. Our endowment has been “growing at record rates” – the least our administration can do for us is ensure we don’t get robbed while parking on their property.
Monday October 1, 2007 

Somebody should take some of that endowment, and hire a new Logic professor, because apparently your current one sucks balls.   

New blog logo
FBMG Machine Gun Shoot

11 thoughts on “Anti-gun letter to the editor at Brandeis U.”

  1. Hmm, in a weird kind of way I kind of respect the view that feels so strongly about keeping cops and guns seperate that they are willing to do the same thing with brains and academia.

  2. Dude… you were a lil’ harsh there. After all, it IS “Be Kind to the Mentally Handicapped” month… 😉

    As for “non-students on campus”: I’ve dated a number of college students over the years. I’m sure security is tighter now, but I remember LIVING in the dorm (while not being a student)…

  3. I almost felt sorry for that kid. His letter was so poorly written and illogical. It reminds of one of those shows where they make fun of a person who isn’t in on the joke and they are oblivious (e.g. Borat).

    Did he really suggest that the campus have a ninja?

  4. On behalf of all the other Jeffs in the world, I apologise for this prat.

    Just so no-one forgets, ten years ago we in the UK had our handguns confiscated. Since then shootings, mainly by handguns, have roughly doubled. The latest victim was a Polish nurse working in the UK, killed in the crossfire a couple of days ago while two goblins settled a difference in the street.

    Sadly, I have to report that neither creep could hit the other.

    At least we had one Jeff worth listening to. Name of Cooper. RIP.

  5. From a recent beanvine: Virginia Tech Massacre: I’ve followed this article since it happened and held my tongue till now. Seems the big kahuna of blamesomebody has decided the campus was a major screw off for not alerting the students and faculty we had a gun slinging evil little twit running around shooting people for hours all across several buildings. “We’re gonna look into it and make a PA system available for emergency announcements,” yeah..that’ll deter these gunners, you betcha!

    Not going to argue that one…it WOULD have helped and may have even saved some lives but there is another possibility that seems to be too taboo to discuss or mention. What just floors me is the campus authorities actually BELIEVED that outlawing guns on campus there at V Tech would make it safer for the students and a most progressive fellowship of benign intellectuals.

    The outlawing of guns on campus didn’t seem to affect the shooter, I don’t think the possibility of violating this campus rule was an important and relevant to the crazed gunman, didn’t help 30 people to feel or be any this fine and noble gun denial laws proved that criminals with criminal intent will not be swayed by a stupid sign that says “GUN FREE ZONE.”

    Woe is us! Our SIGNAGE FAILED US WHAT NOW? (gasp)!

    But…(Libs close your eyes here this gets ugly)…if some student or staff member had pulled out a piece and wasted the raving mouth foamer as he came down the hall or threw open a classroom door, it would have ended there and fewer casualties. No one did because the law abiding students and faculty weren’t packing weapons as per school board orders. Several owned guns…at home. Now the efforts being made are running along the lines of: ” lets understand him so we can stop the next one, still no guns allowed on campus..guns are dangerous, guns kill people…it only through understanding that we can cure, intervene, or save this poor tortured soul from exceeding his tolerances and committing an antisocial act..maybe even harming other students…” Talk till the cows come home and not a single one of those dead students will ever come back. Dead is dead and is not negotiable.

    Boy oh Boy! .. I feel safer already, don’t you? Have every confidence that as long a I equip my college and high school aged daughters with flak vests that’ll make ’em even safer yet!

    Blame gaming will surely solve this problem. If we can just hang the deed on somebody we can put this tragedy behind us. Who they hell they kidding? Blame the shooter not the PA system failure or the concern about emotionally alarming the student body…that act physically created students’ bodies…30 of them bloody and dead…bad decision, poor action and lunatic way to address how to stop a mass spree killer.

    But…try this on..what if every room had a special shotgun inside an enclosed glass emergency case and when the madman opened the door he was greeted by a chest full of buckshot from one of his intended victims instead?

    Consider this. In the old West a firearms dealer back east somewhere designed a law enforcement shotgun usable only by the lawmen, that was of a special gauge..14 gauge to be exact (google up 14 gauge greener shotguns frontier America). This was to render useless the idea of stealing and using these weapons on jail guards. Ammo for this guns was available ONLY to law enforcement and prison guards of the day theory being that even if a prisoner escaped his cell and seized the weapon he couldn’t get ammo for it which was in the guard’s pocket. At best if he took out the deputy he had two rounds then no more ammo and was done.

    Pretty clever for the day actually. Weapon tech has come a long way since then, it possible to use a transceiver micro circuit cued to a sensor in the weapon and a matched finger-ring on the finger of say..a professor or campus security cop. The gun is useless if stolen or seized by an attacker without the ring to release guns’ safety features.

    If we put firehoses and extinquishers in glass cases in classrooms for emergency use, stretch your imagination to a double barrel 14 gauge greener shotgun behind a “break me” case it the classroom. Any smart asses, seizing the weapon but lacking the identifying ring on Prof’s hand would find it impossible to fire. Anyone kicking open a classroom door with murder or rampage on their mind would stop right there with twenty or so 25 calibre lead balls in his person.


    The cost of tuition, books and dorm fees is not the only fees you pay going to college these days, the fantasy believers in the college admin office’s insistence on “gun free zones: their pet program is still the number one “deterrent” and answer to this crime according to them and their experts..that and blame a lax system of checks and balances allowing him to actually buy his weapons at a community gun shop. That is also irrefutable and inexcusable but let’s just hammer the school for now… Had he been red-flagged at the gun dealer, another avenue of covert gun ownership can always be found somewhere…just a slight delay? Meanwhile if a legally certified gun owner with a concealed carry permit WHO HAS ALREADY BEEN CLEARED TO CARRY BY THE FEDS AND THE STATE and passing all background checks and standards for gun ownership is prohibited by the University for carrying on campus, the gunowner may have well been on Mars for all the good it did the victims. Why does taking away all the guns make a safer place? Didn’t exactly work out well for V tech now did it?

    Fact: a perpetrator with a weapon and murder on his mind is not deterred in the least by a campus wide gun ban. If lethal injection is no deterrent why would a $500 fine a 10 days in jail be a deterrent? math don’t jell does it?

    Fact: complying with campus rules conflicted with federal right to carry and the students decisions NOT to carry even those who were legally licensed to do so failed that day to be prepared and 30 died…feel bad about that 9mm Glock out in your car prof?..that ladysmith untralight .38 in your drawer at home?

    Here’s my read on it:…if the military can live with “don’t ask don’t tell” concerning sexual preferences then the colleges should also adopt a “don’t ask and don’t tell policy on personal defense weapons including guns being legally carried on a person licensed to do so everywhere else.” In the event of another attack the gun owner would probably gleefully pay a $$$ fine and live to the next semester I sure would, cheap at any price….ask the victims families, I bet they’d agree.

    beansimple said it

  6. First come the nets. Then the criminals will get swords and shields. Next, the security guards, or ninjas, will have to get a trident. Then what happens? Do you like movies about gladiators?

  7. The one thing not addressed here is the campus cops desire and ability to run towards gun fire. I work for a university, we have armed cops, they are (mostly) nice folks. That said, I don’t see most of them as the ‘run into a fire fight’ type. Having talked about shooting with some of them, they aren’t the ‘hitting man sized targets while running and using cover’ types either.

    I have to agree with jeff in this case: don’t give the cops guns. Give the students guns, give the professors guns, give the janator a gun.

    Of course that requires admitting that there are bad people out there, and that might be pushing it a bit too far.

    AE (stuck in the commie wealth of Mass)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *