Monster Hunter Nation

Don’t Forget to Nominate for the Dragon Awards

The reason for this post was that a friend of mine sent me a PM this morning, that they had announced the Hugo nominations, and gave me a link. Being retired from trying to cure Puppy Related Sadness, I only gave the list a brief cursory glance, saw the names of many proper goodthinkers, and counted like a dozen(+) nominations for Tor, so it appears that balance has been restored to their sainted halls of Trufans enjoying themselves in the proper approved manner. I’m sure many wooden buttholes will be sacrificed upon the altar of Social Justice.

So anyways, that was a good reminder that I need to tell everybody that they can still vote in the Dragon Awards.

Wrongfans having wrongfun are still welcome. Vote for what you enjoyed the most*. The Dragon Award is open to everybody. It is free to register, free to nominate, and free to vote. As an added bonus DragonCon won’t treat you with sneering condescension.

And authors, it is okay to campaign for yourself! Spread the word. Get out your fan base. Authors and publishers have always campaigned for awards, they just pretend not to have afterward. DragonCon knows how it actually works, and they want enthusiastic creators to reach out to their enthusiastic fans. It’s okay to be excited.

*Except don’t vote for me. Son of the Black Sword won Best Fantasy last year. I figure once I win an award then it is time to get out of the way and give other people a chance for the fans to show them some love too. Nobody likes some jerk hogging up 50 Hugo noms (Yes, jackass, from the trackbacks I know you read my blog).

Peter Grant wins the 2nd Annual CLFA Award

My friend Peter Grant won the 2nd Annual Conservative Libertarian Fiction Alliance Award for his novel Brings the Lightning

I’ve known Peter for a really long time. We were both moderators on the The High Road way back when. He is a great guy and a darned good author. He’s actually the basis for the MHI character Priest.

So big congratulations, Peter!

Peter edged out Grunge in the voting. I won last year for Son of the Black Sword, so asked to be taken off the ballot (Originally my Tom Stranger was one of the finalists too) but I wanted John Ringo to stay on there. (yeah, saying that once you’ve won an award, and wanting to share the love and make room for other people so you’ll decline future noms, gets complicated when it comes to collaborations and you still want to see your co-author get some love) 🙂


I got the following email today. If you recall, a year ago I put up a scientific survey for an actual scientist friend of mine. (I’ve toured his lab, he is doing some crazy Matrix brain stuff in there).

He is doing some fantastic work though, which has the potential to help millions of people. So if you’d like to help out, the link is below.


Hi folks:

It seems our occasional cabal of writers has taken a hiatus from rabble-rousing.  So I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who promoted my lab survey last year.  We received over 1100 individual responses to the survey, which kicked the results well into the “statistically significant” territory.  [1100 responses / 20 different surveys meant 50-60 responses per survey image – the statistical goal was >30 per image.]

Over the last year we’ve been working with that data – and it is *great* – but we discovered that a database of just 500 pictures is not enough.  We need 1000.  So I’ve put together a new survey of another 500 pictures – again, there’s only 25 pictures per survey, but if enough people take the survey we will get significant results.

I’d love to have your help again this year to promote the survey.  Larry’s MHI fans alone probably promoted around half of the responses.

The info to announce the survey is below – or you can link/share my recent post on Facebook.

Thanks all!
-Speaker / s2la, Speaker to Lab Animals

Dear Friends and Colleagues:

Last year, the Hampson Laboratory Webpage (, conducted a survey of 500 pictures.  We received over 1100 individual responses, for which we are extremely grateful to all who participated, and the people who rallied their own social media groups to our benefit.

This year we have another 500 pictures to classify.   We are asking for volunteers to go to the page and take a survey consisting of 25 images from our set.

Our laboratory is identifying “categories” and/or “features” of pictures that we use to examine how the brain encodes information according to a number of different characteristics – is it a cartoon? Photograph?  Silhouette or drawing?  Is it in color or black & white – if color, which colors?  Are there specific items visible in the picture?

We know that different people categorize pictures in different ways.  Thus, we need to conduct a survey of as many people as possible to find the most likely common classification from a fixed set of categories.

There are instructions and hints on the URL web page ( Clicking on “Take the Survey” will bring up a random selection of 25 pictures.  Enter your responses by clicking next to the features that you think fit the image.  The listed features will not perfectly suit all pictures.  We know this.  The features were chosen for reasons based on the psychology and physiology of human memory.  Therefore, we ask that you choose the closest match(es) from the list of options.  At the end of the page, “Submit” the Survey, and your responses will be written to our server.
If you have time, click on “Take Another Survey” and the webpage will return to the beginning.  Each time you click “Take the Survey,” you should see a new page of 25 pictures. [You can choose your survey page by bypassing the default screen and editing the URL to read: , …v3Survey2.html, …v3Survey3.html, etc. through  …v3Survey20.html.  Again, all results are logged on our server automatically once you select “Submit.”]

Disclaimer:  The survey is completely anonymous – we record only the picture name and 1’s or 0’s representing your choices (you can briefly see the data in the box on the Submit page).   All pictures in the survey are purchased or used under fair use, non-commercial research purposes only.  Your response data contains no personal information.  We conduct no diagnosis or analysis of the participants or individual responses.  The data is used solely to develop anonymous population classifications.

Thank you for participating in the survey.  We appreciate your help.